Welcome to The Educating Parent Beverley Paine's archive of articles about homeschooling and unschooling written over a period of 30 plus years

HomeAbout Blog Articles Curriculum Resource Directory Shop Kids Pages Facebook

Download our FREE The Educating Parent Resource Directories today! Plus... more FREE resources!

Free download a quick guide to getting started with homeschooling and unschooling by Beverley Paine The Educating Parent in this excellent Resource Directory


Download for FREE this huge collection of links to online Australian homeschool and unschool support groups in this special The Educating Parent Resource Directory by Beverley Paine

Plan, record and report all in the one document! Always Learning Books planners available in each year level to suit your homeschooling needs, includes curriculum checklists

Let Beverley and friends help you design and write your own curriculum to suit your child's individual learning needs, learn how to prepare lessons, unit studies and more, record and evaluate your children's learning in this series of 3 parent workbooks developed on Beverley's popular homeschool manual Getting Started with Home School Practical Considerations
Introduction to
Home Education
  National and State
Support Groups
  Yearly Planner, Diary & Report Beverley's Original Home Ed Manual Series of How To
Parent Workbooks

Support Groups: National SA VIC NSW QLD TAS ACT NT
Registration Guides: VIC NSW QLD SA WA TAS ACT NT

Looking for support, reassurance and information?
Join Beverley's The Educating Parents Homeschooling and Unschooling Facebook online group.


Reading Through Tears

by Byron Harrison, VAS Research

Let us start by agreeing that literacy levels are uneven, that some children emerge from schooling as good readers and spellers but that too many children struggle to read everyday print.

Let us further agree that for years employers have been complaining that employees cannot spell and that it doesn't appear to be confined to lower intelligence because universities are also needing to provide basic remedial English courses for some students.

What does that tell us?

1.That the methods of acquiring literacy suit some children but not all?

2.That the teachers do not seem to have any answers, from which we can assume that neither do their trainers?

3. That the deficits don't appear to be caused by intelligence?

4.That the reading levels still fall behind those of other countries which suggests that Australian researchers in education faculties are either unable or unwilling to identify the cause when other university faculties appear to be producing breakthrough changes almost on a daily basis.

5. That, if the teacher trainers are unable to identify the cause, suggests that the diagnostic basis is flawed.

6. That if the teacher trainers are unwilling to identify the caused, there must be some hidden impediment to research.

How do we teach children to read?

The two major strategies for learning to read are:

a) Phonic (sometimes called "code-based" reading because it is based on the blending the sounds of the alphabet code c+a+t= cat) and

b) Whole Language (sometimes called "whole word" because it believes that, because superior adult readers appear to be guessing on the basis of whole words we don't need to use letter sounds. Whole Language is also sometimes also called "meaning based" because it believes that children should be able to guess words on the basis of reading to the end of the sentence ("The dog chased the ***") or by usimng

What is the history of?

The following report is an extract from a paper by Chall, arguably one of the leading authority in the teaching of reading

Chall writes:

"The prevailing view on beginning reading methods in1967 was to start by teaching whole words, emphasizing reading for meaning from the start. Phonics and other word analysis skills were to be introduced, later and slowly. Throughout the elementary grades, a controlled, high-frequency vocabulary was to be used (Chall, 1967)...

In the middle 1960s there was a perceptible but slow movement away from a meaning emphasis to a code emphasis-one that put an earlier and heavier emphasis on the relationship between sounds and letters (Chall, 1967). By the late 1960s and early 1970s the trend was definitely in the direction of code emphasis. By the middle l970s most o f the published beginning reading programs had a code emphasis (Popp, 1975). Even those that were classified as meaning emphasis had earlier and heavier decoding programs in the first grade- an emphasis on phonics found only in the strongest code-emphasis programs of the early 1960s. What brought about this change? No doubt it was a long and growing discontent with the results achieved by existing methods.

There was also research support for the change. Learning To Read: The Great Debate (Chall,1967), by synthesizing the relevant research on beginning reading (from 1910 to 1965) and by analysing the major reading programs, provided the facts needed for discussion and decision. The conclusion that the evidence was stronger for a code-emphasis than for a meaning emphasis seems to have had a substantial effect on the published reading programs that followed, on methods textbooks, and on research (Chall, c. 1977).

What was this "research"?

In the 1970s, in Tucson, Arizona, an alternative method of teaching reading was suggested. It was called the 'Tucson Early Education Model" (T.E.E.M) and was based on the observation that good readers did not appear to be reading using sounds, they appeared to be reading by recognizing the shape of the word or guessing from the meaning of other words in the sentence or from their knowledge of grammatical form.

In Tucson, Arizona (the home of Whole Language) the biggest and most expensive study of teaching reading the massive Follow Through Study was held. It compared 7 major methods of teaching reading and found that the TEEM methodology was one of the worst ways to teach children to read. In the face of criticism, advocates of the TEEM approach changed the name a number of times before the name "Whole Language": was adopted but the T.E.E.M. content went largely unchanged.

Three years later Australian academics ignored the Tucson Whole Language adverse research findings and mandated Whole Language throughout Australia.

In Dec 1992 Members of the Australian House of Representatives Standing Committee on Employment, Education & Training reported "We were appalled that during the inquiry State, Territory and Commonwealth education authorities were unable to tell the committee, with any degree of accuracy, the extent of the problem as it exists in primary schools because most systems do not test basic skills on a systematic basis. It appears, however, that the numbers could be as high as 25 per cent of students and may represent the majority of the school population in some education districts. (This report was submerged in the Dissenting Appendix 1 p63).

In April 2004, twenty six senior academics and researcher signed an open letter to the Minister condemning "Whole Language guessing" as unscientific. The signatories were drawn from Psychology, Speech/Hearing and Language research, Education research, Diasability development, Audiology, Special Education, Communication Science, Linguistics.

All three national inquiries (USA, UK and Australia) independently recommended a Systematic Phonics approach to the teaching of reading.

Instead of following the "Phonics-first" recommendations of their National Inquiry, Australia adopted NAPLAN that, more than a decade later, still doesn't test phonic skills

This approach, classified as a meaning emphasis (Chall, 1967), assumed that there is no fundamental distinction between the reading processes of the beginner and the mature reader. In essence, it proposed only one reading process-the mature one.

In Australia Harrison, Zollner & Magill revealed evidence of widespread phonic deficits. We demonstrated that at the age of seven, 49% of 'failing readers' and 29% of 'superior readers' lacked the necessary memory storage capacity to support the whole word guessing strategies promoted by Whole Language.

In Scotland's longitudinal study, the Whole Language-based administrators accepted that the Phonics first approach produced better outcomes but refused to introduce it to schools " no matter what the research says ".

In Britain, Turner examined the records of 150,000 children and linked the greatest peacetime decline in reading skills to the introduction of Whole Language and was sacked.

In 2005 the British House of Commons published the results of a 7-year trial, the National Literacy Strategy, which required teachers to add extra teaching in phonics to the then-dominant Whole Language programs. They found that the mix of methods produced inferior results to strictly phonic methods, confirming our conclusion that phonics and whole word processing are competitive not cooperative strategies in the infant years.

In Jan 2015 The New South Board of Studies (Australia) conducted the first audit of what is being taught in Australian teacher-training centres. They found:

•  that teaching of reading is mired in theory, with too little focus on practical skills;

•  that schools needed to identify the gaps in their knowledge and commission the retraining of existing teachers;

•  that universities have the attitude that nobody tells them what to do and who to enroll and were reluctant to cooperate with the external audit;

•  that courses had a stronger emphasis on years 3 to 6 rather than the first three developmental years of schooling when basic reading habits are established.

•  that training colleges were teaching strategies that were discredited and not based on research evidence

Nine months later (Oct. 2015) the Victorian Auditor-General (Australia) reported:

•  The Victorian Education Department consumes a third of government spending but fails students.

•  Bonuses have been paid to top departmental managers despite dysfunction, flagging student performance and defrauding of school funds by departmental executives.

•  15 of the department's long-term outcome indicators have either deteriorated or shown no significant change.

•  The Acting Auditor-general is quoted as saying that "the Education Department has failed to be a learning organisation for a long time"

•  The Auditor General's department has conducted 27 audits covering literacy and numeracy, teachers' performance, student completion rates etc. The audit reports that "These audits have consistently revealed a depressing pattern of underperformance. Collectively these audits have prompted questions about the department's governance, leadership and planning activities.There has been a culture of complacency. defensiveness and siloing within the department and lack of accountability across its leadership. Unless the culture is changed, the department's performance will not improve".

So there we have it:

The level of failure of Whole Language has thus been reported many times throughout the English-speaking world and yet Whole Language continues to be promoted by certain teacher training colleges and education departmental administrations. The failure of Whole Language continues to be hidden by the simple expedient of not testing phonic skills and thereby hiding the resultant massive levels of phonic deficit.

The refusal to adhere to the research, the international evidence of declining reading and spelling skills, the pro-phonic experience of teachers who have to pick up the pieces and the criticism of Education from researchers in other faculties makes one wonder how educators and administrators have got away with malpractice for three decades.

American Academic Martin Kozloff disputes the word-guessing strategies of Kenneth Goodman the father of Whole Language and draws attention to the change from simple phonic-based teaching to complex Whole Language attention to 'selecting, testing, confirmation and revising'.

He claims that this has driven the simple, sequenced teaching of beginner readers into complex theories of processing that Kozloff describes as 'esoteric' which is defined as "understood by or meant for a select few".

In other words, academics in minor universities promoted their international and publishing careers by making the simple teaching of reading obscure, thereby creating an elite minority preoccupied with elevating the prestige of their departments.

That conclusion melds exactly with a lecture given in Hobart by Australia's leading Whole Language guru who, when asked how to make submissions without detailed test data, openly exhorted Tasmanian teachers to "increase the rhetoric" when applying for government funding or when discussing the teaching of reading with parents. In other words he advocated 'conning' the government and parents by using weasel words, words that appear to be science-based.

• These are the academics who have controlled teacher training. It is no wonder that reform is impossible in teacher training where brain-washing is substituted for evidence.

• These are the people who derided phonics as 'barking at print' and denigrated phonic teachers as being out of date and ,without any supporting evidence, drove them into retirement or compliance.

• These are the people who attacked experienced academic researchers like Turner in the UK and Prof. Jackson in Hobart and the 24 researchers from cognitive faculties throughout Australia who described Whole Language as having no basis in science.

• These are the people who, when the Systematic Phonics-first approach was shown to outperform every aspect of reading (including comprehension) in Scottish schools, still refused to abandon Whole Language "no matter what the research says".

We can now understand their refusal to admit fault, their changing the name but not the content of teacher training, their refusal to test phonic skills out of context, their weasel words and wordy explanations of simple processing tasks.

We can now understand recent highly critical audits by the NSW Board of Studies and the Victorian Auditor-General's Department in 2015.

We therefore now release the diagnostic system used in our research for use by any teacher, any parent. If you can spell you can test.

But VAS Theory not only explains why Whole Language fails so many children. It enables parents

• to detect the child at risk;
• to identify the type of error pattern (poor sounds, inability to blend sounds into syllables, inability to blend syllables into multisyllabic words, name/sound confusions, b/d/p confusions, inaccurate word guessing, word reversals, proof reading etc etc);
• to identify teaching strategies appropriate to the VAS levels;
• to predict the type of error patterns that will arise from inappropriate teaching;
• to measure and report on remedial progress in every underlying skill;
• to empower parents to have a fact-based discussion with schools;
• to provide in-service training and mentoring of novice teachers;
• to provide a guide and standards on every sub-skill to home-schoolers;

Background lectures:

The following videos are released without charge at
http://vasreadingecho.com and http://vaslearningcentre.com.

•  Testing a child
•  VAS Theory.
•  The 4 th year slump
•  The VAS/Phonic relationship
•  Analysing the data
•  The classroom analysis


Legal opinion on the Disability Discrimination Act is that current Whole Language teaching practices are not only unethical, they may be illegal.

The Act requires teachers :-

a) to diagnose each child's problems,

b) to design a program that addresses those problems,

c) to inform parents of short term goals

Teachers however are not being given the training to deliver the first requirement under the Act and that automatically eliminates the other two legal requirements.

If that legal opinion is correct, then compensation may be sought on behalf of the significant number of children who failed to read as a consequence of science-free teaching practices.


We have now reached the tipping point, the stage where parents and teachers are beginning to understand some of the non-sensical, classroom practices, where over-generalised school reports no longer expose reading deficits, especially phonic deficits, where research in the USA, England, Australia and Scotland have openly condemned Whole Language practices in the K-3 grades.

Our on-line technology now delivers power and control back to parents and teachers.

Martin A. Kozloff Rhetoric and Revolution , Kenneth Goodman's "Psycholinguistic Guessing Game" Watson School of Education University of North Carolina at Wilmington February, 2002

Was this article helpful? Was it worth $1.00 to you? Your gift of $1 or more helps to keep this site operating offering encouragement and reassurance to families wanting better outcomes for their children.

Thank you for your gift contribution!

Beverley Paine with her children, and their home educated children, relaxing at home.

Together with the support of my family, my aim is to help parents educate their children in stress-free, nurturing environments. In addition to building and maintaing this website, I continue to create and manage local and national home educating networks, help to organise conferences and camps, as well as write for, edit and produce newsletters, resource directories and magazines. I am an active supporter of national, state, regional and local home education groups.

"You've been an inspiration to me, I love the way
you really listen to people."

"Whenever I read your writing I always come away
with increased confidence in my ability to provide and
share a wonderful learning journey with my family!"

"Your guidance, understanding, support and words of
wisdom changed our lives. We now offer support and
organise many homeschooling events for others."

"Thank you once again for your prompt and friendly service.
I am convinced that your books are going to add
quality and peace of mind to my journey of teaching my kids
at home! Just from studying your website, until almost
2am in the morning, I 've been encouraged!"

"Thank you for all your many,many reassuring words
over many, many years. You probably don't know exactly how
valuable you are to the Australian Home Education community.
I've been reading your stuff for maybe 8 years or more now.
And I'm very grateful."

Want to learn how to write your own education plans to suit
your unique children's individual learning needs?

Looking for quality curriculum and teaching tips ?

Over 1000 reassuring and informative articles to help
build your confidence as an Educating Parent

Welcome to the World of Home Education
and Learning without School!

It's been and gone but you don't have to miss out! Purchase the full set of recordings of the 2022 Australian Homeschool Summit, expert help from experienced Australian home educators, all you need to get your started and continuing on your homeschooling or unschooling adventure with your children! Over 30 workshops, downloads and more.

We began educating our children in 1985, when our eldest was five. In truth, we had helped them learn what they need to learn since they were born. I am a passionate advocate of allowing children to learn unhindered by unnecessary stress and competition, meeting developmental needs in ways that suit their individual learning styles and preferences. Ours was a homeschooling, unschooling and natural learning family! There are hundreds of articles on this site to help you build confidence as a home educating family. We hope that your home educating adventure is as satisfying as ours was! Beverley Paine


Getting Started with
Home Educating Series of


#1 Create Your
Own Curriculum

#2 DIY Lesson Plans
& Unit Studies

#3 Recording and Evaluation Made Simple

$10.00 each (includes postage)

let experienced home educators Beverley, Tamara and April walk you through HOW to create a learning plan that builds on solid foundations that works for YOUR family AND ticks all the boxes for home educaton registration with part 1 of this getting started with home educating serioes of parent workbooks, Create Your Own Curriculum!
Let experienced home educators Beverley, Tamara and April walk you through HOW to create a learning plan that builds on solid foundations that works for YOUR family AND ticks all the boxes for home educaton registration!

To see the full range of Beverley Paine's books on homeschooling, unschooling and natural learning visit Always Learning Books

Tap into Beverley's experience through her books

"Your books, your blogs helped me beyond words...
they helped me to find comfort in knowing it is ok to choose
exactly what is best for my family." Nisha

"Your books and information are mind blowing and already
I am feeling good about this new experience." Diane

Connect with Beverley and ask questions
through her online The Educating Parents Homeschooling and Unschooling Facebook support group.

purchase Beverley's practical and common sense books on homeschooling and unschooling
"Your guidance, understanding, support & words of wisdom changed our lives." Leslie

"I feel specially inspired by Beverley's words and, the more I read her comments, the more inspired I feel, since my need for support, respect for different parenting styles, and information are fully met." Marijo

The information on this website is of a general nature only and is not intended as personal or professional advice. This site merges and incorporates 'Homeschool Australia' and 'Unschool Australia'.

The Educating Parent acknowledges the Traditional Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Owners, the Custodians of Australia, and pay our respects to Elders past and present and extend that respect to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people viewing this website.

complete comprehensive step by step program that teaches you how to craft your ultimate homeschool

Australia's best home education consultant, let Tamara Kidd guide and help you prepare your home education registration application or review

Online science lessons for primary school aged home educating children

Teach Maths in the way that children learn with MathsUSee by MathsAustralia

30% discount for purchases from ReadyEd Publications when you use the code 'homeschool' at  the checkout

reset your mindset for homeschooling success with deschooling essentials a quick course to help build your confidence as an educating parent

200 pages of templates, planning pages, tables, prompts and record sheets to organise your whole year!

subscription video art lessons by Australian artist

Home education is a legal alternative
to school education in Australia.
State and Territory governments are responsible
for regulating home education and have different
requirements, however home educating families
are able to develop curriculum and learning programs
to suit the individual needs of their children.

animated Australian flag

Without revenue from advertising
by educational suppliers and Google Ads
we could not continue to provide information
to home educators. Please support us by letting
our advertisers know that you found them on
The Educating Parent. Thanks!

Beverley's books are excellent for building confidence as a home educator says Tracey, homeschooling mum.

Support Centre
Contact Us | Join a Support Group | Beverley's Books | Resource Directory | Blog | Donate

About The Educating Parent
Beverley Paine | April Jermey and Always Learning Books | Advertise with us


What is Home Education Why Home Educate Getting Started & Registering Different Ways to Home Educate
Life as a Home Educator Resources & Support Teens and Beyond Curriculum and Teaching Tips
Unschooling & Natural Learning Travelling & Home Educating Other: just for fun, general, etc Children's Pages

animated smiling face Thank you for visiting!

Beverley Paine, The Educating Parent
The opinions and articles included on this website are not necessarily those of Beverley and Robin Paine,
nor do they endorse or recommend products listed in contributed articles, pages, or advertisements.
This website uses browsing cookies and conducts other means to collect user information in order to display contextual ads.
Text and images on this site © All Rights Reserved 1999-2022.