|

Thank you for visiting!
|
The Case Against Standardised Testing
© Beverley Paine
Over the years I have had lots of conversations with friends who are teachers about the pros and cons of standardised testing. While they generally find little positive about the educational benefits of testing, only one refused to test the children in their classrooms, and that was because this one teacher belonged to a small alternative school that did their best to use natural learning techniques.
This annoys me, but nowhere near as much as teachers' absolute opposition to standardised testing or similar evaluation practices used to grade their performance as teachers. It seems to me that if standardised testing is good enough for the children in their care then it should be good enough for them!
Universally teachers oppose the use of standardized tests as a means to evaluate staff or schools or to decide how money is allocated to schools. Here in Australia we've even seen teachers go on strike or conduct 'go slow' or 'stop work' campaigns to protest at any hint that such practices will be put in place. They also loudly protest at any movement toward using the results of standardised tests to compare schools, just in case their school 'does badly' and parents begin to move children to 'better performing' schools.
Yet comparative testing of children is endorsed as a useful tool for measuring children's educational and developmental performance.
My question is how effective is standardised testing at evaluating learning?
Standardised testing is used to judge the growth of knowledge and skills by measuring performance on one test in one moment of time. It is a snapshot. What can we tell about a person from a photograph? Few of us would be keen to pronounce judgements about a persons character - particularly if we had to write them down in a report that would last several years and quite possibly having a lasting impact on that person's future, based on snapshot image.
Yet this is what happens to children as a result of testing and exams. Even a series of tests, given over time, will only capture snapshots of performance. At best they are an aid to the evaluation process. At worst they can be used to undermine the educational process.
Too much emphasis on the results of standardized testing usually translates into the practice of teachers "teaching to the test". Instead of building life long learning skills and ability they stuff children with a set menu of disconnected bits of information that can memorised and regurgitated on the day of the test. The aim of this exercise is to make the teacher look successful and the curriculum effective. Good grades keep politicians happy - arming them with ammunition to further cut the education budget. The children of our nation deserve better than these petty cost cutting measures.
The use and reliance on standardised testing erodes the quality of education.
True learning is interest-driven and highly individualised. This makes it very difficult to measure. Portfolios and continuous assessment will do the job but these take time and when classrooms are full of up to thirty children teachers don't have that time.
Furthermore, tests test test-taking ability. It doesn't take bright students long to work out how to ace test, or write formulaic essays or reports that are easy for teachers to mark. Tests erode the capacity for creativity, innovation and imagination.
Many tests are poorly written. Often the answers are incorrect. Apart from making a mockery of the educational process, errors in tests and answers erodes students' confidence in the education process. In addition, many tests are culturally and educationally biased. Worst of all, tests are used as blunt instruments to label children, and fit them into social hierarchies that have a lasting effect, well beyond their schooling years into adult life.
The political reality for educational administrators is that the public will support school systems only when they see demonstrable results. But it has nothing to do with learning. When will we stop harming our kids with such misguided bureaucratic practices?

After 20 years of being a contact and support person
Beverley no longer takes phone call or email inquiries.
Please join one of her yahoo groups if you want
to know more about homeschooling or have a question.

|
|
SEARCH this site:
If you like what you read here, you can order Beverley's books!
Be the first to find out about new books, ebooks and booklets by Beverley!
Interested in homeschooling,
but still not sure? Read
'All You Need Is...'
Looking for educational resources?
Home Education Directory
Questions about homeschooling?
Browse the Homeschool Australia Article Library,
or join our
Frequently Asked Questions
online support group.
Wondering what to teach? See
Australian Homeschool Curriciulum
What's new on
Homeschool Australia? Subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Children Learning Naturally
Online Support Group
Travelling and homeschooling?
Keep in touch with
Aussie Homeschool Campers!
Unschool~Kidz!
Home education is a legal alternative
to school education in Australia.
State governments are responsible
for regulating home education.
Different states have different
requirements, however
homeschooling
families are able
to develop curriculum
and learning
programs to suit the
individual
needs of their children.
For more information:
Home Education Association
Text & Images on this site
Copyright © 1999-2008
All rights reserved
Terms and Conditions of Use
|
|
Please note:
The information on this
website is of a general
nature only and is not
intended as personal
or professional advice.
|